Biography
Articles
Books
Back to
Charlotte Ave. Church of Christ Home Page
 

Worldly and Inconsistent Living
Reprinted from The Spiritual Sword
David R. Pharr


“Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils” (I Cor. 10:21). In an impressive contrast Paul had shown the difference between our communion with the blood and body of our Savior and the outrageous fellowship implied in eating sacrifices offered to idols (I Cor. 10:16-20).  He declared that idols were not gods at all, but devils (demons), and urged, “I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils.” By saying, “Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of devils . . .” he was not declaring that there was some physical restraint that made it not possible. No doubt, some in the Corinthian church were guilty of that very thing. The point was that to do so would be an unacceptable inconsistency–an inconsistency which God would not accept.

The feigned righteousness which is called hypocrisy is simply a deliberate or careless lack of consistency between the life one professes and the life he actually lives. “If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth” (I John 1:6). What “we say” suggests more than a statement. It is the pretense of religion without the commitment to live consistently with the principles of righteousness. “He that saith he abideth in him ought himself also so to walk, even as he walked” (I John 2:6).

Overt hypocrisy is described this way: “They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate” (Titus 1:16).

There are also those whose lives are described as having “a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof” (II Tim. 3:5). These are people whose religion makes little difference in their lives.  There are those who, except for possibly participating outwardly in some religious activities, would be hardly less Christian if they professed infidelity.

Certain things ought to be characteristic in the lives of all who are in the church.  They should be faithful in worship and active in the work.  They should happily affirm their membership in the church of Christ. They should be committed to learning and to upholding the authority of the Scriptures. They should oppose all forms of religious error. They should even be boldly outspoken in their stand for truth and right.  These are some of the things that identify their religious profession.

But there are other things which also ought to be evident in all who profess to follow Christ.  They should be scrupulously honest in all their business dealings, paying debts in a timely way and being fair and reliable in all transactions.  They should be modest in apparel and chaste in behavior.  They should abstain from all intoxicants. They should guardedly shun places of worldly entertainment and forbid it in their homes. They should avoid any appearance of immorality. Their speech should be wholesome and helpful, never hateful, vulgar or suggestive of evil. They should be careful in what they say to, or about, other people.  Anger must be controlled.  Charity in word and deed should characterize their relations with neighbors and co-workers, as well as with church and family.  They should be equal in their good treatment of all people regardless of race, culture, education, or economic standing. Material prosperity should be balanced between personally enjoying it and applying it for the good of others to the glory of God. They should be known for their good deeds. They should understand and gladly accept that there are differences in the ways of a Christian and the ways of the world.

The concern of this article, however, is that sometimes–too often–there are those who want to be identified with the Lord’s people, but by their worldly and inconsistent living they are in reality causing the church to be despised.  Many encouraging stories have been told of how Christ-like examples opened hearts to the gospel. We are less likely to advertise them, but doubtless there are as many stories, or more, which could illustrate how the influence of ungodliness has turned souls away.  Peter described the influence of false teachers, saying that because of them and their followers “the way of truth shall be evil spoken of” (II Pet. 2:2). When the world despises the church for its stand for truth, that is to the shame of the world.  When the world despises the church because it finds hypocrisy within it, that is to the shame of the church.

 

Inconsistent Ministers

As a preacher, I assert the liberty to speak of hypocrisies among preachers. I am quick to say that most of my preaching brethren are God-fearing and morally upstanding men.  All should be.  But there are shocking exceptions. Those who minister the word should seek to live exemplary lives.  Yet some do not. Some who preach against adultery have been themselves caught in secret affairs. Others by suggestive remarks and flirtations have created for themselves reputations as womanizers. Others are known to their neighbors as overbearing husbands and harsh fathers. Uncontrolled anger is not becoming in “the servant of the Lord,” who is instructed that he “must not strive, but be gentle unto all men” (II Tim. 2:24). We have encountered some whose words and actions betray racial hatred. There are also preachers who have a reputation for unpaid debts.  Yet others have gotten involved in shady business activities, selling fraudulent stocks or nearly worthless products. The crime is magnified as these deceitful transactions are masked with a show of piety.

Taming the tongue is a challenge for us all (Jas. 3:1ff), but it has been said of some preachers that they are “tongue-tied, tied in the middle and loose at both ends!” The Bible description is more poignant: “Their throat is an open sepulcher; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness” (Rom. 3:13f). Confidences cannot be shared with them because they are known gossips. Others indulge in lewd jesting.  There are even some who are effective at speaking gospel truth, but who are caught lying about other things.

Are we being uncharitable when we admit that some ministers have reputations for gluttony? Or for laziness? Or for selfishness? Or for haughtiness?  Or for rudeness? Or for sanctimoniously demanding special privileges? Or for being influenced by financial gain?  And what of one who preaches “the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” and then divides brethren and tears up congregations? What of those who are so willing to chastise others while excusing their own shortcomings? The old saw that people should “do as I say, not as I do” only compounds the hypocrisy.

 

Paul’s Rebuke

It was such inconsistency that the apostle found in the hypocrisy of Judaism. In principle, the same rebuke applies to anyone who preaches one way and lives another.

Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God?  For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written (Rom. 2:21-24).

The obvious offenses named are compounded by their giving reason for the heathen to blaspheme. The third commandment forbad irreverent use of the name of God. The text implies that one might be guilty of blasphemy not only by his own mouth, but also by actions which give occasion for others to blaspheme “through you.” By evil influence arising from violation of any commandment may also be the cause for violation of the third commandment.  Nathan specifically charged this against David, saying that because of David’s adultery and murder, “by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme” (II Sam. 12:14).

Commenting on Paul’s charges, Matthew Henry made this observation about hypocritical inconsistency in ministers:

The greatest obstructors of the success of the word are those whose bad lives contradict their good doctrine, who in the pulpit preach so well that it is a pity they should ever come out, and live so ill that it is a pity they should ever come in.

What we say of preachers, however, has no less application to elders, deacons, teachers and every member. Who will deny that inconsistency of life is widespread in our congregations?  Let Heaven judge, but is it not obvious that as a people we too often fail to distinguish ourselves by sanctified living?  This is not said without appreciation for the multitude of faithful men and women who deny “ungodliness and worldly lusts and . . . live soberly, righteously, and godly in this present world” (Titus 2:12).  Neither do we forget the wonderful young people who are determined to “flee youthful lusts” and who “follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart” (II Tim. 2:22).  Nor do we fail to realize that none of us are perfect and that faultfinders can always find something to criticize.  But let every worldly minded and worldly living hypocrite know that such a lifestyle brings contempt for the church and condemnation to the soul.

 

Worldliness in the Mainstream

It is not typical that members of the church are guilty of what civilized people consider gross moral evil.  Such was the case with the infamous fornicator in Corinth, who was guilty of such “as is not so much as named among the Gentiles” (I Cor. 5:1). We can be thankful that scandal to that degree is not common among us.  What is all too common, however, is willingness to accept the worldliness that is allowable in society’s mainstream.

There are some questions that need to be asked about our conformity to the world.  Are we seeing the same movies, watching the same programs, hearing the same music?  Do our youth find their heroes in Hollywood and concert halls? Is our modesty (or lack of it) defined by current fashion?  What is left which will cause us to blush? (See Jere. 6:15.)  Are our Sundays truly the Lord’s Day?  Where are the parents who won’t allow their daughters to attend the prom, and the youths who determine to stay away on their own? Does the notion that “everyone else is doing it” make it seem appropriate to pad expense accounts? to exaggerate insurance claims?  to go along with school raffles?  Are we now so sophisticated that we no longer pray at our meals? In the affluence of our churches have we excluded the poor and unfortunate?  (See Jas. 2:1ff.) With our associates so often divorced, are we finding it easier to justify adulterous unions?  Is there really much difference in the way we use our wealth? How is it that adolescents and young adults, who grow up with the church, can enter into immorality with so little pain of conscience?

Unfortunately, it has come to the place that the world is rarely shocked when they see professed Christians living the same way they do.  In the observations of many, religion is little more than an affiliation. Many no longer expect that church people will behave much differently than the unchurched. It seems that both have the same ambitions, pursuing the same temporal goals, go to the same places, laugh at the same things, and make the same excuses.

Giving ourselves as living sacrifices requires that we “be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God” (Rom. 12:2). Worldliness begins with wanting to fit in.  Sanctification means living apart. We cannot have it both ways (I John 2:15-17; Matt. 6:24). “Friendship of the world is enmity with God” (Jas. 4:4).

 

God Hates It

The Old Testament prophets were forceful in their denunciation of hypocrisy. The principles are the same in both testament, but energetic censures from such as Jeremiah and Amos should impress us with its enormity.

Will ye steal, murder, and commit adultery, and swear falsely, and burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other gods whom ye know not; And come and stand before me in this house, which is called by my name . . . (Jere. 7:9-10)?

I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies.  Though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meat offerings, I will not accept them: neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts. Take thou away from me the noise of thy songs; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols. But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream (Amos 5:21-24).

 

Walking Worthily

A story is told of a denominational preacher who justified being unable to answer a scriptural point by saying, “You people are better at arguing the Bible, but we are better at living it.”  Regardless of the bias in his claim, it does remind us that sound doctrine needs to be accompanied with sound conduct.  Paul urged the Philippians to “conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ” (Phil. 1:27 NASB). The same emphasis is in Ephesians 4:1-2.  “I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, with all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love . . .” Peter and others were rebuked when it was seen “that they walked not uprightly according to the gospel (Gal. 2:14). Their discrimination against Gentile Christians not only was not becoming to the gospel, Paul viewed it as implied repudiation of the gospel. Deliberate, or even careless, wrongdoing may do harm far beyond what we imagine. We may be able to logically explain why “hypocrites in the church” should not keep someone away, but logic rarely keeps a man from seeing what he is sure he sees.  A woman asked a preacher, “Isn’t there a difference in sin a Christian commits and sin committed by the unsaved?” “Indeed, there is,” he replied, “it’s worse!”

Influence is expressed positively as being “the salt of the earth” and “the light of the world” (Matt. 5:13-16). The figure is repeated in Philippians 2:15, with emphasis on being apart from the world. “That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world.” But when the lines between Christian living and worldly living are blurred, the salt loses its savor and the light is dimmed. One who is unwilling to “walk worthy” is worse than worthless to the cause of Christ!


Back to Articles Menu
Carolina Messenger
Spiritual Sword


Back to Charlotte Ave. Church of Christ Home Page