Why We Teach That Miraculous Gifts Have Ceased
Reprinted from The Spiritual Sword 1999
David R. Pharr
Every
good gift is from above (Jas.1:17). This includes
those gifts which are natural abilities, such as
skills in singing, in speaking, in helping others,
etc. These are talents which are developed through
study and practice, but they are nonetheless gifts
from God. It is important to distinguish, however,
between natural gifts and the supernatural abilities
described in the New Testament. Those miraculous
gifts were not mere talents, but special powers
provided by the Holy Spirit.
Those
gifts were real, genuine miraculous gifts. No
believer can doubt that various ones were empowered
to heal the sick, to receive revelations, to discern
spirits, to speak languages they had never learned,
etc. A list of nine such gifts is found in I
Corinthians 12:8-10.[i]
We believe and teach that the Holy Spirit actually
gave such powers to various ones. But we do not
believe that the Spirit is giving miraculous gifts
to people today. Why do we teach that miraculous
gifts have ceased? Why do we believe that those
things served only a temporary purpose?
Rightly Dividing
One of
the basics of “rightly dividing” (II Tim. 2:15 KJV),
or “handling aright”(ASV) the Bible is to discern
to whom, or about whom, things are addressed. Of
course there are many instructions and promises
which apply to everyone, but there are other things
that pertain only to certain ones. For example,
there is a specific promise of unequaled wisdom and
great wealth in I Kings 3:11-13, but we know that
this does not apply to us, only to Solomon. Again,
we can find a prohibition against preaching in Asia
(Acts 16:6), but we understand that this was
intended only for Paul. These obvious examples
demonstrate the necessity of determining to whom
specific things apply. That miraculous gifts are
named in Scripture is not the issue. Rather, we
must determine whether those references apply to
Christians in every age, or did they pertain only to
certain ones in New Testament times?
Apostolic Foundation
Understanding the temporary purpose of miraculous
gifts begins with the place of the apostles in the
beginning of the church. The apostles were the
Lord’s “ambassadors” (II Cor. 5:20), his
commissioned agents (John 13:20; Matt. 18:18; I Cor.
14:37; 11:1-2;). They laid the foundation by
preaching the gospel (I Cor. 3:11), and through
their teaching and writing the church was guided and
shaped into the institution the Lord intended (Matt.
28:20; I Tim. 3:15; II Tim. 2:2; II Thess. 2:15).
Jesus
had promised the apostles that they would have the
miraculous assistance of the Holy Spirit (Jn.
14:16-18). On Pentecost, therefore, they were
“baptized” with the Spirit (Acts 1:5), which gave
them “power from on high” (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:8;
Acts 2:1ff). Jesus promised that the empowering
Spirit would guide them “into all truth” (John
16:13), would provide them with miraculous memory
(John 14:26), and would reveal things they had not
yet been told (John 16:12). Thereby they set in
place and defined Christ’s church. Thus, the church
was “built upon the foundation of the apostles and
prophets” (Eph. 2:20).
The
point to be emphasized is that the apostolic role
was unique, pertaining only to the beginning. They
delivered the faith “once for all” (Jude 3 ASV).
Their office was in the foundation. It was,
therefore, a temporary office. They still have
authority over the church (through the inspired
record), but no provision was made for others to
take their place then or now, and any who claim the
apostleship are liars (Rev. 2:2; II Cor. 11:13).[ii]
As Everett Ferguson explains:
[The
apostles] belong to the beginning of the church, for
such a task is chronologically limited. When a few
years later the apostle James was killed (Acts
12:2), no successor for him was chosen, the reason
being that James still held his office. Judas had
renounced his apostleship and fallen away from his
ministry (Acts 1:20, 25). Death in the case of
James, by way of contrast, did not end his testimony
to the resurrection; in fact, his death as a martyr
to his faith only enhanced his witness to the
resurrection. Hence, he continues to fill his
apostolic function as the foundation on which the
church exists. Paul’s statement that Christ
appeared to him “last of all” (I Cor. 15:8)
indicates that there would be no continuation of the
office of apostle in the church. Paul viewed
himself as an exception (“one untimely born” 1 Cor.
15:8), for the Lord would not continue his
appearances and commissioning of apostles.[iii] |
We
teach that miraculous gifts have ceased because they
were intrinsically connected with the administration
of the apostles. The apostles were a part of the
formation of the Christian system, not of its
continuing history.
Unique Apostolic Sign
This
is important in understanding the cessation of
miraculous gifts because signs and wonders in the
first century church were directly and essentially
connected with the work of the apostles. Their
commission to be apostles was confirmed by their
ability to do miracles (II Cor. 12:12; cf. Rom.
15:18-19; Mark 16:20; Heb. 2:3-4). These miraculous
signs included healing the sick, casting out demons,
raising the dead, etc. Of particular importance in
this study, however, was the sign of imparting
supernatural gifts to others. Hebrews 2:3-4 says
that the teaching of Jesus was confirmed to “them
that heard him” (apostles), and that God bore them
witness with “both with signs and wonders, and with
divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost”
(emp. added). They certified their apostleship by
conferring gifts of the Spirit to others. Though
many other Christians in the New Testament were
empowered to do various other miracles, only an
apostle could impart such powers to others. This
ability to bestow spiritual gifts was a unique
apostolic sign.
Imposition of Hands
The
apostles conferred the gifts by the laying on of
their hands. It is significant that for a time
following Pentecost there is no reference to anyone
except the apostles themselves having any miraculous
powers (Acts 2:43; 3:1ff; 5:33; et al). But when
the apostles had laid hands on seven chosen men in
Acts 6, it is recorded that afterwards at least two
of them, Stephen and Philip, could then do
miraculous wonders (Acts 6:6, 8; 8:5-6, 13). The
first reference to their being empowered followed
the imposition of the apostles’ hands.
This
was demonstrated even more clearly when two apostles
came to the very place where Philip himself had been
doing miracles in order that his converts “might
receive the Holy Ghost.” (Acts 8:15-17). It should
be carefully noted that though Philip had been
empowered by the Spirit to do miracles (by the
apostles laying hands on him), he could not himself
transmit the Spirit to others. It was necessary,
therefore, for Peter and John to come to Samaria
that those recently baptized might be given the
Spirit. And it is specifically stated that the
Spirit was given when “they laid their hands on
them.” The Bible then reinforces the point by
stating that “Simon [the converted sorcerer] saw
that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands
the Holy Ghost was given” (Acts 8:18; cf. Acts
19:6). Simon had seen Philip doing miracles, but
this special miracle—the power to give others gifts
of the Spirit—was not something he ever saw Philip
doing. We teach the miraculous gifts have ceased
because the authority to confer them was reserved to
the apostles alone, and when the apostles were no
longer here, the gifts were no longer given.
Extended Their Ministry
When
the apostles conferred these gifts to others, it not
only affirmed their apostleship, it also extended
their ministry. In the absence of the completed New
Testament, such gifts served to “establish”
congregations. Paul wrote the Roman brethren that
he wanted to visit them “that I may impart to you
some spiritual gift, to the end that ye may be
established” (Rom. 1:11). This did not mean
“establish” in the sense of beginning, but to more
fully assist them in being all that the Lord
wanted. (Do not overlook the implication that Paul
would have to be there in person to impart these
spiritual gifts, which could only be done by the
imposition of apostolic hands.)
This
purpose is in view in Ephesians 4:7-16 where what
was given to the apostles and their fellow workers
was said to be “for the perfecting of the saints,
for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of
the body of Christ” (vv. 11-12). But the text goes
on to show that miraculous endowments were intended
only “till” their purpose was completed (v. 13).
The following paraphrase by Macknight shows the
thrust of the text:
These
supernaturally endowed teachers are to [were to]
continue in the church, until, being fully
instructed by their discourses and writings, we
all, who comprise the church, come, through
one faith and knowledge of the Son of God to perfect
manhood as a church, even to the measure of
the stature which when full grown it ought to have;
so that the church, thus instructed and enlarged, is
able to direct and defend itself without
supernatural aids.[iv] |
The gifts were necessary in the infancy of the
church to bring the plan of God to maturity, which
he describes with the metaphor of a “full grown man”
(ASV). In the completed revelation the church is
fully formed. We teach that miraculous gifts have
ceased because the New Testament provides a perfect
pattern and nothing miraculous is needed either to
amend the plan or to confirm that it is from God.
To say otherwise would be to deny that we have a
perfect revelation.
Gifts to Cease
The 12th chapter of I Corinthians lists various
gifts and discusses their place in the church,
especially emphasizing that they are intended for
harmony, not division. Then in chapter 13 Paul
continues by showing that love is far superior to
any of the gifts. In pressing the point, he names
three of them, as typical of the rest, and declares
plainly that a time would come when their purpose
would be ended. “Charity never faileth: but whether
there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there
be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be
knowledge [miraculous knowledge, I Cor. 12:8], it
shall vanish away” (I Cor. 13:8). In verse 13, he
adds faith and hope to charity as things that would
“abide” (continue) after the miraculous gifts had
ceased. He is not, of course, pointing to the
heavenly state as when the gifts would cease because
there will be no place for hope in heaven (Rom.
8:24-25). Instead he is pointing to a time in the
Christian dispensation when the gifts would “fail,”
“cease” and “vanish away.”
This would be when their purpose was completed.
These gifts had the purpose of receiving and
confirming divine knowledge. At that time
revelation was not complete. “For we know in part
and we prophesy in part.” When this was written the
gifts were still needed. But when revelation would
no longer be “in part,” when it would be compete
(“perfect”), “then” the gifts would cease. “But
when that which is perfect is come, then that which
is in part shall be done away” (v. 10). The time
when gifts would cease is specifically stated. It
was “then”—when prophecy was not longer “in part.”
“Then” the need for the gifts would be finished.
Paul illustrates the reasonableness of this by the
fact that a man reaching maturity no longer has a need
for “childish things” (v. 11). The gifts were needed
during the developing, childhood, phase of revelation,
but when their purpose was finished, it would be
unreasonable for them to continue. This is analogous
to the metaphor of the “full grown man” we found in
Ephesians 4:13. In a second illustration he compares
the period when the New Testament was yet “in part,”
not complete, to seeing only a dim reflection in a
mirror. But the time would come when one could look
“face to face,” fully, at the revealed plan of God (v.
12). In his third illustration he again refers to the
“in part” state of revelation (“I know in part”) and
points to the time when one could “know fully” (ASV),
as surely “as also I am known.” This does not refer to
one’s intellectual grasp of the revelation, rather to
the revelation itself. During the lifetime of the
apostles “all truth” was revealed (John 16:13). There
is nothing more that God intends for us to know.
We teach that miraculous gifts have ceased because we
have the plain Bible declaration that they would
cease. They were needed while revelation was
incomplete, but no longer needed when the New
Testament was in place. To teach otherwise would
be to contradict the Bible.[v]
Endnotes:
[i] Is it not logical that if some miraculous gifts
are still with us, it should follow that all of
them would be? Yet those who claim certain gifts
usually ignore others. Those who claim the gifts
often cite Mark 16:17-18 as authority for tongues
and healing, but except for a few fanatics, they
want no part of the snakes and poison.
[ii] Mormons, and a few other cults and sects, claim
to have apostles, but unlike the true apostles
they were not chosen directly by Christ, are not
eyewitnesses of Christ, do not have inspired
memory, are not guided into all truth, and can
make no valid claim of the signs of an apostle.
[iii] Everett Ferguson, The Church of Christ,
(Grand Rapids:Wm. B. Eerdman’s Pub. Co., 1996), p.
306.
[iv] James Macknight, Apostolical Epistles,
(reprint, Nashville: Gospel Advocate Co., 1954),
loc. cit.
[v] The last chapter of The Book of Mormon
copies portions of I Corinthians 12 regarding
spiritual gifts and then brazenly contradicts the
Bible: “. . . all of these gifts . . . never will
be done away, even as long as the world shall
stand . . .” However, what Mormons contradict in
their “scripture” others contradict in their
claims, when they say they still have the gifts.
Back to
Articles Menu
Carolina Messenger
Spiritual Sword
|